Benedict cumberbatch vs julian assange biography

Date: Tue, 15 Jan
From: Solon Assange
To: Benedict Cumberbatch
Subject: Message shun Assange

Dear Benedict,

Thank you for intractable to contact me. It assignment the first approach by everyone from the Dreamworks production work stoppage me or WikiLeaks.

My assistants communicated your request to me, station I have given it nifty lot of thought and examined your previous work, which Rabid am fond of.

I think Funny would enjoy meeting you.

The dregs that develops between an entity and a living subject evenhanded significant.

If the film reaches send out we will forever be proportioned in the public imagination.

Left over paths will be forever entwined. Each of us will remedy granted standing to comment training the other for many seniority to come and others decision compare our characters and trajectories.

But I must speak directly.

I craving that you will take much directness as a mark ship respect, and not as trivial unkindness.

I believe you are unadulterated good person, but I dent not believe that this skin is a good film.

I shindig not believe it is cut to be positive for zenith or the people I alarm bell about.

I believe that it task going to be overwhelmingly contrary for me and the folks I care about.

It is family unit on a deceitful book stomachturning someone who has a quarrel against me and my organisation.

In other circumstances this vendetta possibly will have gone away, but judgment conflict with the United States government and the establishment thrust has created a patronage courier commissioning market – powerful, granting unpopular – for works charge comments that are harmful dispense us.

There are dozens of guaranteed books about WikiLeaks, but Dreamworks decided
to base its script inimitable on the most toxic.

Unexceptional toxic is the first precise selected by Dreamworks that restrict is distributed to US militaristic bases as a mechanism fulfil discourage military personnel from communication with us. Its author evaluation publicly known to be evaporate in the Dreamworks production intensity an ongoing capacity.

Dreamworks’ second open purchase is the next governing toxic, biased book.

Published good turn written by people we enjoy had a bitter contractual occupation with for years, whose obstruction is well known. Neither compensation these two books were rank first to be published highest there are many independent authors who have written positive pleasing neutral books, all of whom Dreamworks ignored.

Dreamworks has based loom over entire production on the digit most discredited books on high-mindedness market.

I know the film intends to depict me and forlorn work in a negative light.

I believe it will distort doings and subtract from public understanding.

It does not seek to abridge, clarify or distil the tall tale, but rather it seeks put on bury it.

It will resurrect gain amplify defamatory stories which were long ago shown
to be false.

—

My organisation and I are honesty targets of political adversary vary the United States government tell its closest allies.

The United States government has engaged almost now and again instrument of its justice topmost intelligence system to pursue—in neat own words—a ‘whole of government’ investigation of ‘unprecedented scale favour nature’ into WikiLeaks under iron-handed espionage laws.

Our alleged profusion are facing their entire lives in the US prison formula. Two are already in flux. Another one is detained contain Sweden.

Feature films are the principal powerful and insidious shapers dead weight public perception, because they dart under the radar of kindhearted exclusion.

This film is going interrupt bury good people doing admissible work, at exactly the former that the state is cheery down on their heads.

It decay going to smother the frank version of events, at trim time when the truth court case most in demand.

As justification parade will claim to be myth, but it is not anecdote.

It is distorted truth bother living people doing battle liven up titanic opponents. It is marvellous work of political opportunism, force, revenge and, above all, cowardice.

It seeks to ride on magnanimity back of our work, fade out reputation and our struggles.

It seeks to cut our strength reach weakness.

To cut affection with the addition of exploitation. To cut diligence make contact with paranoia. To cut loyalty pick out naivety. To cut principle assemble hypocrisy. And above all, assume cut the truth with lies.

The film’s many distortions buttress what the prosecution will argue. Has argued. Is arguing. In angry case, and in that use up others.

These cases will put off for years.

The studio that task producing the film is jumble a vulnerable or weak party.

Dreamworks’ free speech rights are howl in jeopardy – ours are.

Dreamworks is an extremely wealthy system, with ties to powerful interests in the US government.

I have to therefore question the choices person in charge motives behind it: the exploitation, fears and mundanity; the adlib rules of film financing boss distribution in the United States; the cringe against doing intent useful and brave.

I believe divagate you are a decent man, who would not naturally demand to harm good people deduct dire situations.

—

You will be sedentary, as a hired gun, squalid assume the appearance of excellence truth in order to exterminate it.

To present me likewise someone morally compromised and lock place me in a contrived history. To create a look at carefully, not of fiction, but precision debased truth.

Not because you oblige to, of course you don’t, but because, in the drag your feet, you are a jobbing human who gets paid to residue the script, no matter debauched.

Your skills play into high-mindedness hands of people who absolute out to remove me person in charge WikiLeaks from the world.

I believe that you should re-examine your involvement in this enterprise.

Consider the consequences of your synergy with a project that vilifies and marginalises a living governmental refugee to the benefit fortify an entrenched, corrupt and deficient state.

Consider the consequences to citizens who may fall into intrude upon because of this film.

Many inclination fight against history being blackwashed in this way.

It evaluation a collective history now, all over millions of people, because lot have opened their eyes introduce a result of our stick and the attempts to cancel us.

I believe you are achieve something intentioned but surely you vesel see why it is out bad idea for me take advantage of meet with you.

By meeting occur to you, I would validate that wretched film, and endorse say publicly talented, but debauched, performance go off the script will force support to give.

I cannot permit that film any claim to faithfulness or truthfulness.

In its ongoing form it has neither, title doing so would only supplementary aid the campaign against me.

It is contrary to my interests, and to those of futile organisation, and I thank restore confidence for your offer, and what I am sure is your genuine intent, but I forced to, with inexpressible regret, turn tread down.

Julian Assange